Identifying bacterial menu choices from the host buffet during infections.

During his development of the germ theory of disease, Louis Pasteur compared cholera and anthrax infections and remarked “Quelle différence donc entre le vibrion septique et cette bactéridie, et n’est-il pas remarquable de voir se multiplier dans 1=organization animale des êtres aussi dissemblables par leur mode de nutrition!” (1). An abridged English translation of this phrase reads “So what’s the difference between the septic vibrio and this (anthrax) bacillus, and is it not remarkable to see the organization of microscopic beings so dissimilar in their mode of nutrition multiply in the animal!” While Louis Pasteur made many seminal contributions to microbiology, one concept that has been largely overlooked is the role of pathogen nutrition and physiology during infection, specifically with regard to carbon nutrition (2). In this context, Jorth et al. (3) have explored the use of RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and next-generation sequencing to obtain a high-resolution transcriptome of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans during growth in vitro and in a murine abscess infection. They identified a large number of metabolic genes whose expression is differentially upregulated during infection, including those for formate dehydrogenase (fdhF1F2) and fumarate reductase (frdA to frdD), which are associated with fermentative and anaerobic metabolism, respectively. Mutants lacking these genes retained in vitro growth characteristics but experienced a 10-fold reduction in bacterial numbers in a mouse abscess, thus confirming the RNA-seq results. Previous studies of A. actinomycetemcomitans abscess formation by other investigators concentrated on virulence properties (4), so metabolic genes were not identified. Overall, the experimental strategy described by Jorth et al. (3) provides a nice template for future investigations of bacterial physiology during infectious processes. A. actinomycetemcomitans has a small 2.1-Mb genome with an estimated 2,134 coding sequences (5). Although A. actinomycetemcomitans has been traditionally associated with periodontal disease (5), it has also been associated with other infections, notably, endocarditis (6) and abscesses (7, 8). In their study, Jorth et al. (3) used the murine abscess model as the infectious dose could be better controlled and tissue sampling more easily performed than would be the case in a periodontitis infection. One other advantage of A. actinomycetemcomitans as a model for initial technique development is the small genome of this organism (5). This would minimize complications in data interpretation due to the potential redundancy of metabolic pathways seen in other bacterial pathogens with larger genomes, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa (9) and Staphylococcus aureus (10). The use of a chemically defined culture medium is extremely useful during investigations of bacterial physiology (11) to ensure in vitro experimental reproducibility and provide a point of reference. In this particular study, Jorth et al. (3) used a chemically defined Socransky medium (12), which was developed to model the oral environment. To our knowledge, no other defined medium for A. actinomycetemcomitans exists. While one might argue that Socransky medium does not mimic the conditions in abscess environments, this medium does provide a basis for reproducible physiological investigations of A. actinomycetemcomitans. While fermentative and anaerobic metabolism genes were identified in their most recent study, previous work by these same investigators showed that A. actinomycetemcomitans exhibits aerobic metabolism when grown in mixed culture in vitro under microaerophilic conditions mimicking periodontitis (6) and in vivo in the murine abscess model (13). As shown in Fig. 1, one would anticipate that physiological changes in A. actinomycetemcomitans may accompany its move from monoculture to mixed infections and manifestations in endocarditis. As this in vivo knowledge is gained, we will be able to investigate this organism under more clinically relevant laboratory conditions. In 1878, Pasteur et al. recognized the importance of the host as a culture medium during infections (1). The study of Jorth et al. (3) provides a useful experimental strategy whereby pathogen nutrition and physiology can be monitored during infections by us-